There is no need for a Creator to create this universe. David Hume suggested that the universe is eternal. The secular world has been on a mission to remove God of the Bible from the origins debate.
What is Ken Ham talking about?įirst, let me give you some historical backdrop. I am not an arrogant person, I am just following the science. William Lane Craig responded to Ken Ham in a video interview given to Dr.Joshua Swamidass. Ken Ham immediately responded to this idea on his blog calling Mr.Craig arrogant and pseudoscientific. God did not create the universe, solar system, planet earth, life, plants, animals and human beings in six 24 hour consecutive days as written in the first chapter of Genesis. William Lane Craig has been saying that Genesis 1-11 is mytho-history. If we’re to avoid these two options, he says, then we have no choice but to embrace some Noble Lie that will inspire us to live beyond selfish interests and so voluntarily achieve social coherence.Today’s question, in the fight between William Lane Craig and Ken Ham, who is right? On the other hand, there is “the totalitarian option”: The state imposes social coherence at the expense of people’s personal fulfillment. So what are we to do? Rue says there is on the one hand “the madhouse option”: We just pursue self-fulfillment regardless of social coherence. This is because on the view of relativism the search for self-fulfillment becomes radically privatized: Each person chooses his own set of values and meaning. According to Rue, “The lesson of the past two centuries is that intellectual and moral relativism is profoundly the case.” He says that the consequence of this realization is that the quest for self-fulfillment and the quest for social coherence fall apart. Rue, confronted with the predicament of modern man, boldly advocated that we deceive ourselves by means of some “Noble Lie” into thinking that we and the universe still have value.
0 kommentar(er)
